You don't need to post every day
Daily posting advice is survivorship bias sold as discipline. Five a week, sustainably, beats seven a week for a month and then nothing.
Every LinkedIn growth account tells you to post daily. Some say twice daily. The people saying this are, without exception, people whose full-time job is LinkedIn.
You run a company. The advice does not transfer, and following it has a specific failure mode.
The daily-posting death spiral
You commit to daily. Days one through six are fine — you had a backlog. Day seven you have nothing, so you post filler. Day nine, more filler. Day twelve you notice the filler is getting less engagement than your good posts, which feels like failure. Day fourteen you stop entirely.
You have now trained your audience that your posts are mostly skippable, and trained yourself that posting does not work. Both are wrong, and both were caused by the cadence, not the content.
Why five is the number
Weekdays are when your buyers are on the platform. Five posts is enough that you are present without being noise, and few enough that every post can be one you actually wanted to publish.
More importantly, five is survivable. The thing that compounds on LinkedIn is not any individual post — it is being there in six months. Almost nobody fails at LinkedIn because their posts were not good enough. They fail because they stopped.
Seven posts a week for a month, then nothing, loses to five a week forever. It is not close.
What to do with the pressure
The urge to post daily is usually the urge to make up for lost time. It does not work like that. The founder who posts five times a week for a year is unrecognisably ahead of the one who posted thirty times in March and nothing since, even though the second one posted more.
Pick a cadence you can hold on your worst week, not your best one. Then hold it.